🎉 Limited time: Save the 199€ setup fee - register now! Save now
Best Practices 11 min read

Analyzing Employee Surveys: From Data to Action

How to properly analyze psychological risk assessment results: Understanding metrics, identifying critical areas and deriving effective measures.

S
Fachredaktion Arbeitsschutz

TL;DR – Key Takeaways

  • Analysis is the crucial step between survey and measures
  • Compare results with benchmarks to identify critical areas
  • Look beyond averages – distributions and outliers matter too
  • Involve employees and managers in interpreting results
Team bei der Analyse von Befragungsergebnissen

The Importance of Proper Analysis

The best survey is useless if results aren't properly analyzed. Analysis is the critical translation step from raw data to concrete action recommendations.

Avoiding Common Mistakes

  • Interpreting results without context
  • Only looking at average values
  • Overvaluing individual outliers
  • Not using comparison values
  • Not discussing results with those affected

Understanding Key Metrics

Averages

The average shows typical response behavior:

  • Good for a first overview
  • But: Can hide extreme values
  • Example: Average of 3.0 can consist of all 3s or of 1s and 5s

Standard Deviation / Spread

The spread shows how uniform responses are:

  • Low spread: Uniform perception in the team
  • High spread: Different experiences – look closer!

Distributions

How are responses distributed across the scale?

  • What percentage respond critically (e.g., "disagree")?
  • Are there clusters at the extremes?
  • Is the distribution symmetric or skewed?

Response Rate

The participation rate affects significance:

  • Under 50%: Interpret results with caution
  • 50-70%: Good significance
  • Over 70%: Very good representativeness

Benchmarking: Contextualizing Results

Your results alone don't tell you if they're good or bad. Comparison values are crucial:

Types of Benchmarks

  • External benchmarks: Comparison with other companies, industries, nationwide
  • Internal benchmarks: Comparison between departments, locations
  • Time-based benchmarks: Comparison with previous surveys

Interpretation

  • Better than benchmark: Strength – but don't get complacent
  • In benchmark range: Average – check improvement potential
  • Worse than benchmark: Action needed – develop measures

Identifying Critical Areas

Traffic Light Logic

Many tools use a traffic light system:

  • Green: Uncritical, better than benchmark
  • Yellow: Attention required, in benchmark range
  • Red: Critical, significantly worse than benchmark

Prioritization

Don't tackle everything at once. Prioritize by:

  • Severity: How strong is the deviation?
  • Impact: How many employees are affected?
  • Feasibility: What can realistically be changed?
  • Leverage: What has the biggest positive effect?

Deepening Results

Quantitative survey results show the "what" but not always the "why." To deepen understanding:

Results Workshops

  • Discuss results with affected teams
  • Ask about backgrounds
  • Analyze causes together
  • Collect measure ideas

Focus Groups

  • In-depth conversations with selected employees
  • Gain qualitative insights
  • Test hypotheses

Manager Conversations

  • Discuss results with supervisors
  • Include context information
  • Gain commitment for measures

Communicating Results

Create Transparency

  • Inform all employees about overall results
  • Name positive and critical areas
  • Announce next steps

Area-Specific Feedback

  • Managers receive results for their area
  • Observe minimum group size for anonymity
  • Offer support for interpretation

Conclusion

Analysis is the key to your risk assessment success. Take time to interpret results properly and involve those affected. SafeMind provides automatic benchmark comparisons and action recommendations – making analysis a breeze.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I recognize critical results?

Compare your values with benchmarks. Areas that score significantly worse or where more than 30% respond critically require attention.

What response rate do I need for meaningful results?

From 50% results are usable, from 70% very good. For small groups, an even higher rate may be needed.

Should I look at individual results or only overall results?

Both are important. Overall results show company-wide themes, area-specific analyses enable targeted measures.

Glossary Terms in This Article